Persian Gulf states' hostile proxy tactics, driven by US pressure to challenge Iran's post-war ascendancy, demand Iran's decisive strategic response – diplomatic exclusion, Strait of Hormuz leverage, and Resistance Front consolidation – to permanently end their era of dual alignment against their permanent neighbor.

Iran must counter Oman's unilateral Strait of Hormuz move and Trump's sabre rattling with coordinated political-military measures, as sovereignty over this strategic chokepoint is the primary security guarantee preventing the enemy from achieving diplomatically what it failed to win through war.

Iran’s insistence on Clause 1 of the MoU with the United States – requiring a full Israeli military withdrawal from Lebanon and an end to aggression across all fronts – is not an act of symbolic solidarity but a matter of strategic necessity, aimed at preserving and protecting the unified Resistance Front that underpins Iran’s regional deterrence architecture.

Iran's 60-day negotiation framework, anchored by seven conditions – ending hostilities on all fronts, compensation for war damages, Strait of Hormuz sovereignty, sanctions removal, nuclear file closure, and oversight mechanism – asserts strategic superiority, ensures sequential implementation, and prevents any future aggression.

Iran's military doctrine, shaped by survival rather than conquest, uses asymmetric strategies, regional depth, decentralized command, and geographic leverage to impose unsustainable costs on any aggressor – a reality Western narratives routinely obscure.

Iran's post-war strategic ascendancy, as articulated in the Leader's recent message, is anchored in military resilience and regional leverage, exposing US-Zionist decline and creating new opportunities for the Islamic Republic to shape the emerging regional order.

Leader's message on the Iran-US war-ending MoU transcends diplomacy, asserting a governance model where legitimacy flows from people-leadership unity, transparency safeguards accountability, and mobilized public vigilance remains the ultimate guarantor of national rights in any negotiations.